Klitschko vs Fury - is Tyson Fury a genuine threat or just a colorful character?If you’re a Tyson Fury fan, you’re probably not going to digest this piece very well. In fact, it probably won’t stay down at all. But know this. I’m a boxing fan. Just like you. And would love nothing more than to see a spectacular battle unfold in Klitschko vs Fury next weekend.

I’m not even fussed about whose hand gets raised when it’s all said and done. Win or lose, I would like to see Fury perform well. For mine, yours, and boxing’s sake.

But this is my take on the fight: Tyson Fury’s chances of beating Wladimir Klitschko are slim and none.

If you’re a diehard Fury fan and have already heard enough, then please, do at least check out the staggering statistics waiting on the other side of the link below. If you can read them without coming to the same conclusion I have, then hey, perhaps you know something I’ve totally overlooked.

 

Wladimir Klitschko vs Tyson Fury Facts and Stats Banner

 

So why am I writing off Tyson Fury (24-0, 18 KO) to such an extent? First of all, it’s not because I dislike the man. I actually think he’s entertaining, a real character. In boxing, especially in the Heavyweight division right now, his outlandish statements and zaniness are plenty welcome, if you ask me.

The reason I’m not backing him in any shape or form is because of more objective reasons; the numbers, solid facts, information we all have to hand. And of course, my opinions of Fury and Klitschko’s skill sets and past performances in the ring.

OK, let me play devil’s advocate for a moment, just to prove I’m no ‘Fury hater’. Physically speaking, Fury has a few notable advantages going for him. The guy is 13 years Klitschko’s junior, stands 3 inches taller, and carries a 4 inch longer wingspan. Fury could also outweigh Klitschko by over 20lbs on fight night – though that doesn’t necessarily belong in the plus column.

All of that doesn’t sway my opinion much when weighing up Fury’s chances, however. The distance between Klitschko (64-3, 53 KO) and Fury in terms of quality is as wide as a crater. If we begin by looking at Fury’s pro career, his best opponents have been Christian Hammer, Steve Cunningham, Kevin Johnson, and Derek Chisora (twice).

All these fighters came to win, and, for the most part, put on a good show. But are they world-beaters? Serious contenders? Anywhere above fringe-level? I’d say not. The cream of the crop here is probably Steve Cunningham, a capable fighter, but one who is arguably a blown-up Cruiserweight.

Now, is Fury, the man who was knocked down hard by Cunningham, ready to take on Klitschko, the man who’s knocked out/handily decisioned all challengers since 2006? Maybe Fury would have a good shot if he’d gained more experience against some decent European tests. Maybe an ex-world champion. But after beating the likes of Derek Chisora? Nah.

While Fury has been facing the softer touches of the division, Klitschko has been taking on far tougher challenges, such as Alexander Povetkin, Kubrat Pulev and Bryant Jennings. And these aren’t the only tough tests Klitschko has vast experience against (see the stats link above).

Klitschko may be criticised as the ‘jab and grab’ guy nowadays, but Fury’s repertoire pales in comparison, both in offense and defense. And perhaps that’s owing to their Amateur backgrounds? Klitschko, who picked up numerous medals on the circuit, came out with a record of 134 wins, 6 defeats. Fury, on the other hand, left the unpaid ranks at just 31-4.

Now, I don’t want to throw every existing stat at you, so I’ll pick the most striking only.

In world title bouts, Klitschko carries 25 wins (19 knockouts), 2 defeats, has beaten 10 current/former world champions, and currently holds the WBA (Super), IBF, WBO & RING titles. Moving on to his November 28th opponent…

In world title bouts, Fury has no experience. No credentials to speak of whatsoever.

See what I’m getting at? I’m finding it terribly hard to work out how Fury, with no experience against decent European/World level opposition, has a chance at beating Klitschko. And let’s remember Klitschko isn’t just a good boxer-puncher. This dude’s known as ‘Dr Steelhammer’ for good reason.

Klitschko’s ramrod jab is one of the best in boxing, and when coupled with a devastating left-hook, right hand, and top-tier footwork, his extensive belt collection would seem safe for now.

I’ve said my bit. Now it’s your turn to let your opinions free in the comments below. Do you agree with my take on Tyson Fury? Semi-agree? Or just think I’m a cynical killjoy who’s ruining the build up to a fight you were really looking forward to?

 

Mark Phillips is the Head Staff Writer/Assistant Editor at BoxingBase.com, and provides worldwide news, coverage and analysis – he can be reached via our Contact Page.